It seems that many delegates in different committees are sharing their resolutions, creating allies, and discussing them during the unmoderated caucus.

In committee 2, in the procedure of granting the unmoderated caucus, the chairs were working hard to make every delegate to be engaged. They’ve been calling out delegates to participate, recommending opposing resolutions, and providing ideas on what delegates should talk about so that the discussion doesn’t go further from the main point. Most of the delegates as well were highly active in the discussion, connecting one problem to one solution, the other problem to the other solution, and so on.

While delegates are dealing with the real problem seriously, they can come up with extreme and impractical resolutions for fun. For example, in committee 4, Russia and the delegates have come up with a resolution to the opioid epidemic that they will assassinate people who are addicted to opioids, with no personal intentions!

It seems to be very interesting to look at diverse aspects of resolutions coming from the same topic.